Відео

The TSA might question why I have a radioactive cookie wrapped in foil in a plastic baggie inside of me... 🧐 I'll just tell them I had to do it for science. I think they'll understand.

Wait 'til you find out he isn't left-handed, but The Dread Pirate Roberts!

IMO Tepco was criminally negligent. Every other plant on the coast that was hit didn't have their backup generators at sea-level. its JAPAN. People warned them about this. This entire thing could have been avoided.

You should do a kystham , and hanford video

I love how these egg heads try to explain away that nuclear energy is completely safe and a viable option.

charcoal briquette, a moolignan

Two questions: Q1.) Should the western world finance research into less squeaky markers? Q2.) Is he writing backwards?

Wow! This is probably the best explanation of radiation I’ve ever seen! Also, the cookie example… 🤌

Thanks for the video

>downplays risks of taking experimental medications. >downplays natural immunity. >implies risks of covid are evenly spread across the American demographic. >is fully okay with calling these "vaccines". Well, at least he won't get banned from social media.

imagine if this guy was the president...

Someone get me some uranium

India may just become nuclear power house if it actually gets thru the three stage nuclear energy programme as penned by Homi Bhabha , a well known physicist.

I feel mean for saying this but the way he talks presentation wise is off to me. I think he also needs to drink something his mouth sounds dry and I can hear spit cackling in his mouth which is one of if not the most annoying thing to me.

Excellent presentation but I have one question that wasn't covered. The waste he talked about was all from the 8% energy that was produced. Only a small room in over 60 years. But what if that 8% became something more like 80%, and over a period of 100 years. How much waste would that create? Might it be a concern at this point? I'm pro nuclear btw, just genuinely curious. Thank you.

So enrich uranium to 3% in your nuclear industry. Obviously no one would enrich to weapon grade%. 80% of the world's population live in dictatorships, like Mr Putin, and Mr Xi, and Mr North Korea and Mr Chetneya, and ...... Mr Pol Pot, .... Military budgets can be excluded naturally. More national grid capacity can be excluded as grid electricity replaces fossil fueled energy. Happy days, more EVs, more electricity, happy days 😀 😄 😊 😁

The future technological evolves. Rooftop solar PV in Australia is $4billion per 1,000mW. $40billion per 1,000mW is the new grid costs, asset value. AUD1 is 0.66USD Batteries are needed. EVs big batteries are perfect as they are mostly parked 23hrs every day. EVs big battery is 'free' with the vehicle. 😊😊😊 Home 10kWh home batteries are $14,000 AUD. each. 😮😮😮 V2G EVs selfplug-in will be the best feature in new vehicles. UTILIZATION FACTOR perfect. 🥰 💞 👌 😍 New grid capacity construction is saved $40billion per 1,000mW.

OMG THE SQUEAKY MARKER IS GONE - THE SQUEAKY IS GONE! PRAISE!

Great content. The symbol looks a bit too cute n fuzzy, much prefer a traffo with rays and a stick figure with big smile eating something.

Recorded end of 2015 you state in vid - how about an update

"Fuel goes in the top"... "high temperature gas"...."waste comes out the bottom"... Sounds like my Uncle Gary.

I am sure my wife could bake a perpetual crypt for nuclear waste that would never degrade and would shield us all from everything.

I'm not holding my breath that Colorado Governor will do this for any of the coal plants he's closing

13:00 “It goes through the roof!” Pun intended?? 😬😂

Were so worried about the radiation that can not hurt us, that we will die from the co2 we blindly produce!

So am I the only one super impressed that the lecturer is writing backwards so easily? 🤨🤔

Great content, cheers from Australia

Is the future here yet?

No, the question is what is radioactivity.

This educator could make paint drying interesting

I was at Chest- an international meeting yearly on Pulmonary Medicine Diseases. There was a Ukrainian physician who presented his data on nuclear related disasters he had seen. It was extensive and terrible. Frank

Wow man u are amazing ❤

Of course when it is Soviet, it is worst accident, but when in america digging nuclear fuel rods into peoples backyards causing 1 million extra cases of cancer and heavy metal pollution in newborn babies, its merely "smol incident"

Its crazy to me that the USA believes they have the authority and responsibility to police others on their nuclear weapons, meanwhile they're the only ones who have proven themselves to be sinister enough to deploy nuclear weopons.

The weight difference (1.0043) is not 4 thousandths of one percent, its 4 thenths of one percent, or 4 thousandths per one unit.

This man is writing backwards and has better penmanship than me 🤯

this guy explains shit the best for an educated audience I love these videos theyre like docus but for people who don't have tiktok brain rot

how is this guy writing so fast in reverse/mirrored loool

best video on youtube, good for aleady intelligent educated audience, unlike rest of the other videos explaining like im 5 years old lol

Good thing Germany turned off their nuclear reactors just in case a tsunami struck Central Europe.

Why did Fufushima need more water?

What is the red in the RMBK? Is it the graphite moderator? Is the water also acting as a moderator? The LWR is a pressurized vessel were the water level remains constant.

3:46 nice math bro

Can SMRs follow load? Can they be taken off line for less than a week?

I've been watching videos about Chernobyl on a channel created by a nuclear engineer. His contention is that a containment building would not have withstood the force of the explosion at Chernobyl.

"If you lose the water, the reaction stops". You made my day. With a lot of good will, lets call this statement "theoretically right" but completely wrong in practise, as as you said, water is used for cooling and if there is something that can blow up a reactor, it's the lack of cooling. Since, if it would be otherwise, the guys at Fukushima would have been very happy when they found out that all the cooling water has gone. However, the opposite is true: That's where the party started....

The containments of most nuclear plants (still!) today will not withstand the impact of a commercial airliner (90 tons, 100m/s). Officially we only know from Belgium and Switzerland that their nuclear plants have passed related tests. From the US we know that (a) related tests are kept secret and (b) most of the plants have not been built to withstand even smaller planes.

I remember a talk from a very well known specialist with more than 35 years of experience in operating nuclear plants and when ask about fusion reactors Prof. Homer J. Simpson calls it "boooooring".

Breaktrough in Fusion Energy? Really. Again? Didn't i heared that like 10, 20, 30 and 40 years ago? It's becoming a running gag. And guess what: We won't need it anymore as we got better alternatives. And cheaper.

Well, the "funny" thing about containments is, they also are not fully solid. Just think about Fukushima, where radio-active material found its way out of the reactor trough the overpressure gas pipes and through the water pipes of the cooling system. So, yes, there is a difference between both reactor types, but none of them is safe. And that 's the important point.